Refugee Council’s response to Asylum and Immigration Tribunal ruling on Zimbabwe - Refugee Council
August 2, 2006

Refugee Council’s response to Asylum and Immigration Tribunal ruling on Zimbabwe

Zimbabweans whose asylum claim has been turned down may now face being sent back after a tribunal ruled that it was not illegal for the government to enforce removals.

In response to the ruling given today at the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal concerning the removal to Zimbabwe of asylum seekers whose applications have been rejected, Tim Finch, Director of Communications for the Refugee Council said:

“We are disappointed to hear this ruling; we still think it’s not safe to remove anybody to Zimbabwe in the present circumstances.

The ruling, while restoring the legal right to enforce removals, nonetheless makes it clear that a lot of people are at real risk if they are sent back. The government has won a small legal victory but not the moral argument.

We are very concerned to hear that the Government is signalling plans to carry out removals this month on the justification that there has been a rise in applications. The judgement doesn’t give a green light to mass removals at all and we hope the government will tread very cautiously and put safety first. In the end, one person sent back who faces persecution or worse, is one person too many.”


For further information contact press office: Hannah Ward 020 7346 1213 (Switchboard: 020 7346 6700). For urgent or out of hours inquiries ring 0870 0555500 & ask for pager 865169.

Show refugees you believe in them this winter

This winter thousands of refugee men, women and children are rebuilding their lives in the UK, will you show you believe in them?